Call and Response with my liberal friend on the Mueller investigation.
The following is a response point by point to a friend's statements on the Mueller investigation. His statements are in blue while mine are in black. My understanding of this argument is that you were denying any need for an investigation because you have not seen any hard evidence of a crime being committed. Now It sounds you agree that there should be an investigation, but that there is still no hard evidence of a crime and that the investigation will not solve anything. But I don’t understand, if you think it won’t solve anything, then why investigate? Maybe you don’t understand why there are at least three ongoing investigations. Or maybe you think it’s all a witch hunt and therefore all just for show. So after investigating Hillary Clinton numerous times, after so many Congressional hearings, what could they find on her? But, I hear you say, if they couldn’t find the smoking gun on her (and by the way, the left-wing media that you criticize, I think unfairly...