Hmmm. . . that Bob Corker?



Image result for bob corker donald trump
Now there's an image you won't see anymore (Boston Globe).
This article is in response to my friend Alex Ioannidis' piece in tribute to the recently announced retired Sen. Robert Phillips Corker, Jr. (R-TN). 

 If not for the Harvey Weinstein sex scandal, the continuing meltdown over the NFL anthem protests, and the chronic saga with North Korea, the main issue this past weekend would have probably been the blow-up between President Donald Trump and the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee may have crept into the top of the news feed. As it so happens that person happens to be a member of his own party and had traditionally been identified with the right wing of the GOP. If you have seen my material before, you can probably imagine that those details don't mean much to me. Bob Corker in my mind represents about as much to do with conservative principles as. . . well, Donald Trump. Trump and Corker have traded insults this weekend, but let's examine perhaps whether Corker even has a record to defend.

The main yardstick for determining a politicians commitment to a certain topic is his or her voting record and beyond that the bills that they sponsor. In some cases the votes in question are purely symbolic as indicated by some senators that voted to repeal Obamacare in 2015 but have since switched their votes. Corker and others of his ilk like Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska and Jeff Flake of Arizona, have mounted the altar of self-promotion by claiming that Donald Trump is ruining the Republican Party and the conservative movement. Here are some actual pieces of legislation with which he has been associated.

S 743 - Marketplace Fairness Act of 2013 (Co-Sponsor)

 This bill passed on a bipartisan 67-27 split, and it requires online sellers to collect and remit sales and use taxes to the state in which the sale took place. Does a bill that further shackles online commerce to the tax structure sound like a "conservative position?

S 160 - Washington DC Voting Act of  2009 (Voted No)


I get the counterargument from some conservatives: "But this would have added just one more extremely liberal district". So let me defuse tht first by adding that this would have also added one more district to ultra-conservative Utah. Although some would say that this only increases government by adding one more congressional seat, let's remember that the Founding Fathers built this nation off of the grievance of "No Taxation Without Representation"? See image.

Image result for DC license plate
S Amendment 279 - Removing the Buy American Clause of 2009 (Voted Yes)

This may be an issue that falls along the fault line of protectionism vs. free trade. However, let's remember that the only thing this measure would have done is allow the US GOVERNMENT to spend money buying more things from overseas.
)



S Amendment 2760 - Auditing the Federal Reserve of 2010 (Voted No)
)
Image result for audit the fed
Along with the Democratic majority Corker and 10 other GOP senators Corker voted against auditing the Fed. Since then federal debt has ballooned from $7.5 trillion to more than $14 trillion.

Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 (Voted Yes)
In a vote that was only opposed by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-ARK) Corker turned the tables on typical treaty ratification in the US Senate bizarrely allowing Barack Obama's as yet unrevealed nuclear disarmament agreement with the Islamic Republic of Iran to be ratified unless a two-thirds majority disapproved of it in the Senate. Usually the opposite is true.

Good time for a switch

I feel that Bob Corker represents the typical fair from the GOP, which is to say that if you consider yourself a conservative beware. Many #NeverTrump conservatives have claimed that they are keeping the president accountable. My question would be: "Who is keeping them accountable?" Thanks to a party full of Bob Corkers, auditing the Fed remains a fringe opinion despite the GOP claims to opposing expanding the federal debt ceiling. Corker-style conservatives oppose DC statehood or representation in Congress while pretending to stand for representative government. And most of all, the GOP under frauds like Bob Corker has claimed to be the vanguard in fighting Islamic terrorism yet they turn around and authorize a nebulous and secrecy shrouded agreement with the USA's most powerful adversary in the Middle East, Iran.

Meanwhile just this September, in typical Republican fashion Corker and 47 other Republicans and 13 Democrats voted to table a vote repealing the open-ended Authorization for Use of Military Force from 2002. This means that while Corker vocally claims the White House is occupied currently by a juvenile minded idiot, he has no problem with the same person using the world's most potent military in wars not sanctioned by Congress in places like Yemen.

I don't usually stay civil, but this time I will. Bob Corker was in the Senate for 12 years. What's the footprint? Where has he gotten the USA, or his state of Tennessee. My feeling is that hes's been a just one more card in a deck of two faced charlatans that claim the mantle of conservatism.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Did the "Dancing Israeli" theorists actually read the FBI file?

Image
A few months ago a friend of mine, like myself Jewish, suggested to me that there would be forthcoming indictments of Israeli agents for involvement in the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. He was convinced that documents slated for declassification would shine a light on an operation by Israel's Mossad that had either prior knowledge or involvement in the plot.  I would be remiss if I did not admit that for years controversial historical events, what are popularly panned as "conspiracy theories", are a topic that has fascinated me. But I've always had a blind spot for the 9/11 theories mostly because there were so many of them, and it is difficult to distinguish serious questions from spaced out hyperbolic speculation. And sure, I'll also admit that the idea that there could have been a nefarious plot to topple the Twin Towers and pull the USA into wars in the Middle East made me uncomfortable. After all, my own family hails f
Read more

A year later Ryan Dawson is Addicted to Lies, Part 1

Image
 As I'm writing this it is the week after the 19th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, the event that defined my generation just as Vietnam defined the generation of baby boomers. It is a bitter day for many reasons. On the one hand there is the largely held sentiment that the almost three thousand victims of the attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center. Another reason compounding it is the lack of transparency by the US government and various other governments regarding the events leading up to the tragic attacks. And yet on top of that is the fact that opportunistic hoaxers have taken it upon themselves to take advantage of that lack of transparency and use the available information to concoct lies and canards in order to fit their worldview. In 2019 I debated one such person, Ryan Dawson of ANC Report. Typically I have the urge to find something redeeming in one of my opponents, but with respect to him the longer the exposure to his material the easier it is to see th
Read more

The Ryan Dawson Refund Guide Part 1

Image
It is undeniable that in the course of the last 60 years going back to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the Vietnam War there has been a process whereby each generation of Americans is confronted with an event that causes them to doubt the official version of events and media accounts. This phenomenon can be seen in a wide variety of topics from campus culture (the Duke Lacrosse Case , Rolling Stone 's " A Rape on Campus ") to scientific data (Michael Mann's " Hockey Stick " saga), to war atrocities ( Ghouta chemical attack , Kuwaiti incubators controversy, Pallywood ), to alleged spying scandals (Trump-Russia scandal). Media organizations do the work of power brokers to promote a story without regard for establishing the facts before going to print (or the airwaves). In many cases when journalists, alternative media, or individual citizens question the conventional logic to the story they are reprimanded by media figures as "conspi
Read more